http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201
Robert Elliot <rob...@teviotia.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rob...@teviotia.co.uk
--- Comment #4 from Robert Elliot <rob...@teviotia.co.uk> 2010-12-23 17:34:05
---
It's not my decision, but I think that basically the thinking is that if you
are in a position where it's appropriate to shut the logging system down or
flush all events in the logging system then you ought to know what the logging
system is, so you can do it directly on the logging system.
SLF4J is meant to be an interface for retrieving loggers and logging to them -
the bare minimum of shared functionality. I don't think it's meant to be
trying to abstract all possible things you might want to do with any given
logging system.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
slf4j-dev mailing list
slf4j-dev@qos.ch
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
