http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schall <mike.sch...@gmail.com> 2010-12-23 20:42:48 --- (In reply to comment #4) > It's not my decision, but I think that basically the thinking is that if you > are in a position where it's appropriate to shut the logging system down or > flush all events in the logging system then you ought to know what the logging > system is, so you can do it directly on the logging system. > > SLF4J is meant to be an interface for retrieving loggers and logging to them - > the bare minimum of shared functionality. I don't think it's meant to be > trying to abstract all possible things you might want to do with any given > logging system. > I would suggest that if SLF4J knows enough to configure logging, it could know enough to shutdown logging. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list slf4j-dev@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
