Hi Federico,
Your pull request has a number of interesting ideas. I think some of
them should be merged into the backward compatible implementation that I
just committed a few minutes ago.
Backward compatibility is the main hurdle to clear. Once that is done,
as now seems to be the case, we can further improve the API piecemeal.
Your suggestions for improvement are welcome. In any case, I will be
reading your proposal once again even more attentively.
--
Ceki
On 29.04.2019 08:57, Federico Fissore wrote:
Hi Ceki
I see you've added a number of commits on branch 2.0, including some
work on the fluent api which are conflicting with the work done in
https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/pull/203
I assume you're no longer interested, are you?
Best
federico
Federico Fissore ha scritto il 19/02/19 alle 13:00:
Hi Ceki
I prepared the branch for slf4j 2.0. I cannot make a PR that targets a
non existing branch: can you make one?
Code is available at
https://github.com/ffissore/slf4j/tree/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT
I've replaced occurrences of java 1.5 and 1.6 to 1.8 and I've included
slf4j fluent
Let me know what you think
federico
_______________________________________________
slf4j-dev mailing list
slf4j-dev@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
_______________________________________________
slf4j-dev mailing list
slf4j-dev@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
--
--
Ceki Gülcü
_______________________________________________
slf4j-dev mailing list
slf4j-dev@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
