Hi Federico,
I mean that it is preferable to make bw compatible changes directly to
slf4j-api module instead of introducing a new module.
Cheers,
--
Ceki
On 30/04/2019 10:25, Federico Fissore wrote:
Ceki ha scritto il 29/04/19 alle 22:55:
Hi Federico,
Your pull request has a number of interesting ideas. I think some of
them should be merged into the backward compatible implementation that
I just committed a few minutes ago.
Backward compatibility is the main hurdle to clear. Once that is done,
as now seems to be the case, we can further improve the API piecemeal.
I'm sure the code in that PR is backwards compatible. Can you point me
to where those changes have broken backwards compatibility?
best
federico
_______________________________________________
slf4j-dev mailing list
slf4j-dev@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
