On 19.12.2019 21:35, Remko Popma wrote:
For the SLF4J API to be genuinely generic enough to span the
requirements and abilities of many possible logging backends, it should
not be too opinionated.
Have you had a chance to look at Yang et al’s work on NanoLog (
https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc18/atc18-yang.pdf,
https://github.com/PlatformLab/NanoLog)?
Thank you for the link. I am reading right now.
_______________________________________________
slf4j-dev mailing list
slf4j-dev@qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
