All, Happy New Year! Ceki, have you had a chance to consider my proposal? I still strongly believe that having a logging API that allows Objects to be logged: 1) opens various possibilities for logging implementations 2) has few (if any) drawbacks.
Thoughts? Kind regards, Remko On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:08 AM Ceki <c...@qos.ch> wrote: > > > > On 19.12.2019 21:35, Remko Popma wrote: > > > For the SLF4J API to be genuinely generic enough to span the > > requirements and abilities of many possible logging backends, it should > > not be too opinionated. > > > > Have you had a chance to look at Yang et al’s work on NanoLog ( > > https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc18/atc18-yang.pdf, > > https://github.com/PlatformLab/NanoLog)? > > Thank you for the link. I am reading right now. > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-dev mailing list > slf4j-dev@qos.ch > http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev _______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list slf4j-dev@qos.ch http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
