Hello Ceki,
I've added some color and removed the adaption layer from the 'unbound'
case. What do you think?
http://no-commons-logging.zapto.org/concrete-bindings-eoo.odg
http://no-commons-logging.zapto.org/concrete-bindings-eoo.png
I think that displaying these stacks horizontally would improve the
presentation somewhat more. It emphasizes what a mess you have when you
include commons-logging in the mix :)
Regards,
Erik.
Op 14-08-11 22:56, Ceki Gülcü schreef:
Hi all,
I've updated the illustrations taking into account your comments. The
updated files are located at:
http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.odg
http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png
http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.odg
http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.png
The audience for these illustrations are users with little or no prior
understanding of or exposure to SLF4J. More concretely, with the help
of these illustrations, new users should hopefully stop placing
multiple binding artifacts on the class path at the same time.
IMO, the arrows convey useful information with respect to direction of
invocations albeit perhaps in a stylistically inelegant way.
Anyway, your suggestions for further improvements most welcome. In
particular regarding the unification of the stacked and arrowed styles
(if possible).
Cheers,
_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
