19.03.2002 20:46:04, "Sung-Gu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If anyone can test the 1.0 branch in it's current incarnation in CVS, >> especially the client-stuff (which I don't use myself at all), that >> would be great. > >Actually, I was going to integrate with commons-http 2.0 in commons project. >However, I'd better to delay it a while. Because it's gonna be many changes >and need to have tests. ^^;
I agree that moving back to the commons-httpclient would be nice at some point, but I'd do it in the HEAD branch as opposed to the SLIDE_1_0 branch. >About the client-stuff, as I glimpse it, there are some minor problems. >The command client with antlr doesn't work ok with a lexical command token >parsing before connection. >And antlr doesn't support the refid attribute of ant yet . so someone could be >some trouble in deploying it. >I think it's possible to find a work-around about that. >Whatever I'm saying above is not important to use the client library, just >minors, I think. ANTLR is only used in the HEAD branch, not in SLIDE_1_0. -chris _______________________________________________ /=/ cmlenz at gmx.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
