> 19.03.2002 20:46:04, "Sung-Gu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If anyone can test the 1.0 branch in it's current incarnation in CVS, > >> especially the client-stuff (which I don't use myself at all), that > >> would be great. > > > >Actually, I was going to integrate with commons-http 2.0 in commons project. > >However, I'd better to delay it a while. Because it's gonna be many changes > >and need to have tests. ^^; > > I agree that moving back to the commons-httpclient would be nice at some point, > but I'd do it in the HEAD branch as opposed to the SLIDE_1_0 branch.
Yes, we can't use it before, as it breaks the API (as you pointed out). > >About the client-stuff, as I glimpse it, there are some minor problems. > >The command client with antlr doesn't work ok with a lexical command token > >parsing before connection. > >And antlr doesn't support the refid attribute of ant yet . so someone could be > >some trouble in deploying it. > >I think it's possible to find a work-around about that. > >Whatever I'm saying above is not important to use the client library, just > >minors, I think. > > ANTLR is only used in the HEAD branch, not in SLIDE_1_0. ANTLR looks like a nice cleanup, but the grammar we use needs a few tweaks (for example, I could get the client to crash by using invalid tokens). Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
