Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > Nevermann, Dr., Peter wrote: >> WRT the Slide 2.0 release: we know that is time for a new >> release and know about how important it is for you all. You >> are completely right! The "only" problem seem to be that we >> cannot find somebody willing to manage the release process. >> Also, there are currently areas in Slide without anybody >> feeling in charge of them right now (e.g. Slide admin or some >> of the store implementations). > > If everyone would agree to drop the stores in the slidestore > package and completely move over to the tx file store and the > the J2EE/JDBC store I currently merge, I would volunteer to > take responsibility for the stores > in org.apache.slide.store.impl.rdbms. I also offer to be the > one for everthing in org.apache.slide.store. > > Oliver
Oliver, what do you think about a move of your current work to the slide CVS. So other could contibute. I think this would be more the open source way. Regarding the current situation with multiple store implementations: What about moving stores in development or with undefined status to a special area. Like scratchpad or so. The build could than optional include this implementations. Or we could seperate each store to a "module". Anything like cocoon blocks. And thanks for your activity in the slide project the last time. A running store implementation would be very good for slide. Regards Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
