Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Nevermann, Dr., Peter wrote:
WRT the Slide 2.0 release: we know that is time for a new release and know about how important it is for you all. You are completely right! The "only" problem seem to be that we cannot find somebody willing to manage the release process. Also, there are currently areas in Slide without anybody feeling in charge of them right now (e.g. Slide admin or some of the store implementations).
If everyone would agree to drop the stores in the slidestore package and completely move over to the tx file store and the the J2EE/JDBC store I currently merge, I would volunteer to take responsibility for the stores in org.apache.slide.store.impl.rdbms. I also offer to be the one for everthing in org.apache.slide.store.
Oliver
Oliver, what do you think about a move of your current work to the slide CVS. So other could contibute. I think this would be more the open source way.
Well, as said before, I will do as soon as I will be granted commit access to the CVS. So this is merely an administrative problem, not my unwillingness to do so :(
Regarding the current situation with multiple store implementations: What about moving stores in development or with undefined status to a special area. Like scratchpad or so. The build could than optional include this implementations. Or we could seperate each store to a "module". Anything like cocoon blocks.
Good idea.
And thanks for your activity in the slide project the last time.
You are welcome :)
A running store implementation would be very good for slide.
Agreed!
Oliver
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
