On 13 Nov 2003, at 12:42, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:On 12 Nov 2003, at 09:30, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:I'm using it with Jetty and it doesn't have any problem. But, like I said, I found the process of taking out pieces from tomcat rather painful.. not something that a newbie would do without major having to look into the code to find out what properties go into the slide.properties file and what goes into the web.xml in order to tell where to fetch the domain.xml file.
I have the same *painful* experience...
I have a really clean setup that runs on jetty (which is much more lightweight than tomcat)
A general DB store is currently being merged and - although there still are some substantial problems - I am optimistic to have it runnig soon.I'm working on it right now.
Oooops. Let's see we get no *new* branches since my efforts all go into the direction of merging them back together again. What have you done so far?
Testing :-) don't worry, I will ask before doing anything substantial.
I proposed to drop all other stores as non of them works correct and the above stores are developed to replace them.+1, sounds like the way to go. More than anything, users hate "dead code" because it's undistinguishable from "life one". So it should either reside in a "scratchpad" or a "proposal" area of the CVS and clearly delimited as alpha stuff.
Agreed.
cool. So, what code are you working on right now?
As for more substantial patches, I'll let you decide what to do. Where do you want the patches, here on the mail list or on bugzilla?
Hmmmm. The proper place would be in the bugzilla, I guess. But experience showed it did not get too much attention in the past. I'd still say, put it into bugzilla.
Ok
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
