> Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > 1.) What features not yet implemented should go into the Slide 2.0 > release? > > There has been a patch JTA patch proposed by Grant Gongaware some time > ago. This made the transaction manager implmentation configurable to use > the containers instead of Slides integratied TM. It also included some > patches moving certain read actions inside transactions. > > While these patches cetainly are valuable (ah, need to check them and > add Grant to the contributors list) the concept of using external TMs is > to be discussed. The idea of connectors to plug Slide into J2EE > containers come up more than once as well. However, this is a bit tricky > as Slide needs a web container (not a full J2EE container) to run in the > first place. This would mean you might have two containers running. > Isn't that weird? > > This really is a philosophical question, I guess. Is Slide something > like a document repository that can be connected to a J2EE container > just like an RDBMS? Or is it an integrated part of a J2EE container > resp. web container (like Tomcat)? >
I think attacking the full container integration is too big a task if we want a 2.0 release early next year. And in any case a J2EE / Servlet Container is 'well specified'. There is no specification, as far as I am aware, for a WEBDAV based J2EE container. It sounds neat, but big and complicated. I think staying focused is important if we want to make a release... Richie > Oliver > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------- This mail sent through the ungerground webmail system --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
