I want to restart a debate on Lucene. My customer ask me to have a search engine in our application in short term.

I know there is a implementation for searching document based on webdav search but in my case, I'm not using the webdav part from Slide.
We are using directly the helper classes. So, in a such context, I think tools like lucene sound great for me. I didn't check completly the current search implemenation but what about the performance ? What about the slide object tree lookup when a search is started ? What about the performance for a full text search ? Obviously, Lucene is quite robust for that.


From now, I don't know if this integration is complex but what not to try ? Please clarify your position, it is not clear for me. Why are you not interesting by Lucene ? If you gives some recommandations, I'm ok to start this integration.

Thanks,
Christophe


Richard Unger wrote:


On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 10:37, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:


Proposal:

Slide 2.0 aims to provide a stable WebDAV-centric low-level content management framework.





How about something like:


snip------------------>

Slide 2.0 will provide a stable content repository for content
management systems and other purposes, featuring:
        * Full WebDAV Support
        * DeltaV WebDAV Versioning Support
        * Support for a variety of backend systems for storing the content
including different databases and file system storage
        * Transactions and Locking for data integrity
        * Flexible control over permissions at a per file level via support for
WebDAV ACL
        * Simple installation on any server supporting Servlet 2.3 and .war
deployment
        * Sample 'ready-to-run' binary distribution including Tomcat 4.1

and much more.

<-------------------------desnip.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]









--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to