> Zeigermann, Oliver wrote: > > Why all those defaults? Looks to me as if this made insertion of > nonsense data possible?! Certainly I am missing something...
These defaults are only part of the result of first schema from Christophe. I took a dump and then sort it, but I was too lazy to clean these defaults. They are harmless - but should not be found in a "stable"-schema. To make the schema even more "beta" - I think PERMISSION.SUCCESSION should also be tinyint(1) .. If SUCCESSION is also a Boolean. regards, alex. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
