Zeigermann, Oliver wrote:
Why all those defaults? Looks to me as if this made insertion of nonsense data possible?! Certainly I am missing something...
These defaults are only part of the result of first schema from Christophe. I took a dump and then sort it, but I was too lazy to clean these defaults.
They are harmless - but should not be found in a "stable"-schema.
OK, I will remove them then.
To make the schema even more "beta" - I think PERMISSION.SUCCESSION should also be tinyint(1) .. If SUCCESSION is also a Boolean.
Nono, succession is the order in of ACEs and thus is an int. The name might be unfortune, but "order" and "sequence" I first thought of have obvious problems.
I understand you and Christophe want me to use your schema then? Ok with me, will commit it after testing and removing of defaults.
Oliver
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
