Obviously, I'm not talking to you directly. I have just a new user requirement for the next year and I want to receive comments from the committer team.
I sent previous mail on Lucene in this mailing list. I never received a clear response/position on that subject.
I do not think you will. It seems nobody has time to build searching using Lucene. So, if you have, this seems fine :) I promise do what I can to help you!
So, just some questions on the current search features in Slide : * What about the performances ?
* Is it possible to search on content ? seems to be optional in webdav search.
* If I'm using only the helper class - not yet the webdav layer - it is not too complex to use the search helper class ? What about lucene within slide in this case. Lucene api is quite simple.
I think Martin Wallmer is the right person to comment on the guts of the implementation. What I can say is:
- without indexes search will be slow.
- basic search includes content
- as far as I can tell (Martin, please correct me if I am wrong here) an AST is generated from the XML query sent over webdav. The real search is done using this AST. I do not know what your searches will look like, but if you can generate such an AST you should be fine.
Oliver
Regards, Christophe
-----Original Message----- From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 11/26/2003 10:48 AM To: Slide Developers Mailing List Cc: Subject: Re: Lucene (again) ! Christophe,
are you talking to me??? If so how come you think I am not interested in Lucene???
Oliver
Christophe Lombart wrote:
I want to restart a debate on Lucene. My customer ask me to have a search engine in our application in short term.
I know there is a implementation for searching document based on webdav search but in my case, I'm not using the webdav part from Slide.
We are using directly the helper classes. So, in a such context, I think tools like lucene sound great for me. I didn't check completly the current search implemenation but what about the performance ? What about the slide object tree lookup when a search is started ? What about the performance for a full text search ? Obviously, Lucene is quite robust for that.
From now, I don't know if this integration is complex but what not to try ? Please clarify your position, it is not clear for me. Why are you not interesting by Lucene ? If you gives some recommandations, I'm ok to start this integration.
Thanks, Christophe
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
