Oliver, Thanks for the feedback. I will check in more detail the code made by Martin I will have time in december. So, I will try to make a prototype.
Regards, Christophe -----Original Message----- From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 11/26/2003 11:30 AM To: Slide Developers Mailing List Cc: Subject: Re: Lucene (again) ! LOMBART Christophe wrote: > Obviously, I'm not talking to you directly. I have just a new user requirement for > the next year and I want to receive comments from the committer team. > > I sent previous mail on Lucene in this mailing list. I never received a clear > response/position on that subject. I do not think you will. It seems nobody has time to build searching using Lucene. So, if you have, this seems fine :) I promise do what I can to help you! > So, just some questions on the current search features in Slide : > * What about the performances ? > * Is it possible to search on content ? seems to be optional in webdav search. > * If I'm using only the helper class - not yet the webdav layer - it is not too > complex to use the search helper class ? What about lucene within slide in this > case. Lucene api is quite simple. I think Martin Wallmer is the right person to comment on the guts of the implementation. What I can say is: - without indexes search will be slow. - basic search includes content - as far as I can tell (Martin, please correct me if I am wrong here) an AST is generated from the XML query sent over webdav. The real search is done using this AST. I do not know what your searches will look like, but if you can generate such an AST you should be fine. Oliver > > Regards, > Christophe > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed 11/26/2003 10:48 AM > To: Slide Developers Mailing List > Cc: > Subject: Re: Lucene (again) ! > Christophe, > > are you talking to me??? If so how come you think I am not interested in > Lucene??? > > Oliver > > Christophe Lombart wrote: > > >>I want to restart a debate on Lucene. My customer ask me to have a >>search engine in our application in short term. >> >>I know there is a implementation for searching document based on webdav >>search but in my case, I'm not using the webdav part from Slide. >>We are using directly the helper classes. So, in a such context, I >>think tools like lucene sound great for me. I didn't check completly the >>current search implemenation but what about the performance ? What about >>the slide object tree lookup when a search is started ? What about the >>performance for a full text search ? Obviously, Lucene is quite robust >>for that. >> >> From now, I don't know if this integration is complex but what not to >>try ? Please clarify your position, it is not clear for me. Why are you >>not interesting by Lucene ? If you gives some recommandations, I'm ok to >>start this integration. >> >>Thanks, >>Christophe > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
