On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 19:55, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2003, at 05:54, Diego Bragato wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After a long discussion with Oliver (thanks Oliver ...) we managed to 
> > arrive at the conclusion that the build.xml needs refurbishment in the 
> > release target.
> >
> > This is heavily significant to everybody: developers users and 
> > community.
> >
> > As my understanding we all use slide in a large quantity of flavors 
> > and fashions. And as long as there are various needs around, it needs 
> > a bit of discussion to you all.
> >
> > What binary distributions you want to produce out of the release 
> > target in the build.xml ?
> >
> > The actual old way of producing jakarta-slide.2.0.0.tar.gz is a tomcat 
> > deployed in a non exactly standard way with a lot of old code.
> 
> I agree. I dislike this myself.
> 
> > There can be the need for a separate binary for the distribution of
> > 1   the slide client                (this would be useful to my personal project)
> 
> I already proposed the cration of a new module for that. Ah, btw, after 
> you guys nominated me committer, I've been elected in the Jakarta PMC, 
> so that makes things a little easier as I can influence the PMC 
> directly now (that that's why I accepted the nomination).
> 
> > 2   out of the box build with tomcat 4.x (please propose me a version) 
> > ideal would be latest       (this would be useful to my personal project)
> 
> > 3   out of the box build with jboss (project www.jbpm.org has one and 
> > it's really nice)           (this would be useful to my personal project)
> > 4   a binary build with the needed wars and stuff for being deployed in 
> > a generic app server (see for example jetspeed project) maybe a 
> >     build.xml can be needed for doing the deployment
> 
> I think that #4 would solve #2 and #3. As for #3, this is not possible 
> as the ASF has a policy not to distribute LGPL software.
> 
> > 5   a zip for the sources
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > 6   a zip with the webdav-test suite
> 
> Agreed. I would go as far as proposing another CVS module for the test 
> entirely. So that would make three CVS module
> 
>   jakarta-slide
>   jakarta-slide-client
>   jakarta-slide-tests
> 

Yay! +1 (despite not actually being entitled to vote)

> which would increase isolation and allow faster development.
> 
> > There can be others (for example producing a ear file) but really 
> > there are various pieces of informations that you all have  and that I 
> > need to get a precise direction in the work.
> 
> no need for j2ee stuff, slide is just a servlet, let's keep it that way.
> 
> > The second task, after we have one or more decent (voted and approved) 
> > binary to distribute, is to have it available as nightly build on the 
> > apache web and share it to the community (we will have to make some 
> > marketing of slide) so that other people can start to use it and test 
> > it.
> 
> yes, this is general practice.
> 
> > This way the slide project will be appreciated by other people for the 
> > real value it has, and I think this is the most important thing.
> 
> +1
> 
> --
> Stefano.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to