On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:58, Erik Hatcher wrote: > On Jan 19, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Michael Oliver wrote: > > Thanks Erik, you are correct, except that in some implementations the > > security is of higher priority than performance. If I take you off > > the > > ACL on a resource, because I own it and I don't want you to see it any > > more....that has to be immediate and positive. > > Sure. A smart "interceptor" should be able to cause the flushing of > things that are invalid when something changes and make that change > immediately in effect. By no means was I suggesting that things be > stale. I know that me saying "cache the Filter in session scope" > caused some red flags - but that is only a performance optimization and > by no means necessary nor does it mean that anything would be stale. >
Touche, I didn't say all I meant and you didn't say all you meant....hit shappens. Long live the horse the horse is dead. Ollie > Erik > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
