Daniel Florey wrote:

> This would be great if jcrri would provide all requirements to build a
> WebDAV layer on top of it (including all the current drafts). As see
> slide as a bunch of java software related to WebDAV. If we could achieve
> this using jcrri I'd vote for it. Stefan (currently working on the
> jcrri) stated in his mails that there might be some problems regarding
> the content model.

sorry daniel, you got me wrong. i was saying that building the WebDAV layer
on top of the JCR api is relatively straight forward. in fact, we already
did a quick&dirty implementation that is running on top of the jcrri.
connect your WebDAV client to http://jsr170tools.day.com/crx/repository
and give it a try.

implementing the JCR api on top of the WebDAV client lib or the Slide api
on the other hand would be quite difficult because of the different content
models of JSR 170 and Slide/WebDAV; WebDAV/Slide's model is resource centric
whereas JSR 170's model is fine granular, i.e. it supports unstructured,
semi-structured and well-structured content.

you can model WebDAV content very easily in JSR 170 but you can't model
all different kinds of JSR 170 content in WebDAV.

regards
stefan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to