Although not a formal voter this gets my +1 Michael Oliver CTO Alarius Systems LLC 3325 N. Nellis Blvd, #1 Las Vegas, NV 89115 Phone:(702)643-7425 Fax:(520)844-1036 *Note new email changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Florey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 1:31 AM To: Slide Developers Mailing List Subject: Slide 3.0 long term plans Hi folks, I've started a thread for discussions about architectural changes in Slide 3.0 some time ago. What about moving this to the Wiki to have a centralized point for further discussions? Beside this I've thought about the following: As Slide 3.0 will introduce some major changes that will lead to Slide level api incompatibilites, I'd vote for setting up a new CVS module for Slide 3.0 as tomcat is doing the same for major versions. This would give us the chance to set up a clean directory structure that reflects our increased wisdom. As the Slide subprojects are big ones (server,clientlib, commandlineclient, testsuite, projector,...) it might also be a choice to split them into different cvs modules. What do you think about this? This would lead to the question if we should try to shift Slide to apache top level (webdav.apache.org) to give the users a better understanding what Slide is all about and to simplify the access to the different subprojects. Remind that the testsuite, the client or projector are not tied to Slide, they work with every WebDAV-compliant server. As stated in the subject of this mail, this are long term plans. But we should start to think about the way to go now as there is a lot of administrative work to be done to achieve this. Cheers, Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
