On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 23:21, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> great that you get this started!
>
> James Mason schrieb:
>
> > I have the client parts of the distribution ready, but I've hit a few
> > snags :).
> >
> > 1) Oliver, can you give the apcvs group write access to
> > /www/cvs.apache.org/dist/jakarta/slide so I can post the files to
> > review?
>
> Sorry for that. Should work now.
Looks good.
>
> > 2) The filenames for the 2.1b1 server download contain the word
> > "server", but the build targets leave that bit out. Should I modify the
> > build script or just rename the files?
>
> Maybe modifying the build script would be best.
Will do.
>
> > 3) What are we doing about the Tomcat bundle? Specific instructions
> > would be good here :). Which version of Tomcat and which build target. I
> > grabbed the 5.0.28 release and ran the jaas-deploy-tomcat-5 target. One
> > thing I noticed is that there is no startup.sh file to patch. I just
> > want to be sure I'm doing this correctly.
>
> Hmmm. All this seems to be right to me. 5.0.28 with
> jaas-deploy-tomcat-5. Worked fine for me. There certainly is a
> startup.sh in my bin directory and it does get patched. What is your
> problem? Is it simply not there? Or did it just not get patched? Note
> that for the patch command in ant you will need to have a working
> "patch" command from the prompt! Are you on windows?
It looks like the tar.gz package I downloaded had problems. For
instance, there were two /bin directories (??). Anyway, I grabbed the
.zip download and everything looks proper with that one.
However, when running the build target the patch to server.xml fails
with the messages:
[patch] patching file
/home/knoppix/downloads/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/conf/server.xml
[patch] Hunk #1 FAILED at 173.
[patch] 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
/home/knoppix/downloads/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/conf/server.xml.rej
The other patches work fine, and I can't see any obvious problems (the
data is on the right line and I have write access to the file), so I'm
not sure what the problem is. Worst case I'll manually apply the
changes, so this won't effect the release, but it would be nice resolve
the issue. I'll investigate more tonight, but if anyone has any ideas or
the time to run a sanity check for me I'd appreciate the feedback.
>
> Concering the projector. It used to be part of the bundled Tomcat
> distributions, but recent comments from Daniel indicated, it might be
> better to skip it for the 2.1 release. I just sent an email for
> confirmation to him, but he did not answer, yet...
>
> > 4) Where should I put the testsuite distribution, src or bin?
>
> Ah, the testsuite! Great that you take care of it! I'd say this is bin.
Sounds good.
-James
>
> Oliver
>
> > -James
> >
> > On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 09:31, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> >
> >>Sounds fine. Still waiting to see that Daniel updates the Projector
> >>installation to the new JAAS distribution. I'd recommend to put the
> >>distributions on
> >>
> >>http://cvs.apache.org/dist/jakarta/slide/2.1b2
> >>
> >>(without linking it anywhere for now) for everyone to inspect.
> >>Additionally, we need a result mail of this vote which must be cc'ed to
> >>the PMC...
> >>
> >>And by the wy, folks, what about the updated release notes. Still could
> >>not detect any activity :(
> >>
> >>Oliver
> >>
> >>James Mason schrieb:
> >>
> >>
> >>>+1 from me.
> >>>
> >>>I can try to put together a release this weekend for Oliver to review.
> >>>I'm having wisdom teeth pulled tomorrow, so by the time Sunday rolls
> >>>around I should be going nuts looking for something interesting to do.
> >>>
> >>>-James
> >>>
> >>>Stefan L�tzkendorf wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi all,
> >>>>we have recently fixed a lot of bugs and had some other changes too.
> >>>>So it would be good to have a new release to get some feedback from
> >>>>our users.
> >>>>
> >>>>The tests I get now running are
> >>>> - functional
> >>>> - DELTAV
> >>>> - BIND
> >>>>all with store: txfile, jdbc with sqlserver (with and without binding)
> >>>>
> >>>>Thats a good state for Beta 2, I think.
> >>>>
> >>>>What do you think?
> >>>>
> >>>>Stefan
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
