Ok, seems I have found the problem.
I fixed an copy issue some time ago.
The following sequence mkcol /abc put /abc/file1 mkcol /def put /def/file2 copy /abc -> /def
leads to (before the fix) /abc /abc/file1 /def /def/file1 /def/file2
that's wrong, I think, because if the target exists, it is to be deleted with Depth: infinity (see RFC2518, 8.8.4).
but if /def is deleted this way /def/file2 must disappear too
So the correct result is /abc /abc/file1 /def /def/file1.
This is true for Binding too. But some of the Bind test cases rely on the older behavior, I will commit the changes to the testcases soon.
With this functional, deltav and bind are running.
Stefan
Stefan L�tzkendorf wrote:
Currently some BIND testcases are failing (:-(. I'd like to fix this before releasing again, but I'm currently not quite sure what the problem is. I try ASAP.
Stefan
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Folks,
after we fixed the Oracle and the Mac OS X blockers are there any other issues you feel that should be addressed before we can get to the next release?
Anyway, should the next release be a beta or a release candidate? Even though there have been additional patches, if there are no more major open issues I would be +1 for a release candidate as 2.1 has been in the release cycle for quite a while...
Oliver
P.S.: James would you be available for a next release soon, anyway?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Stefan L�tzkendorf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
