OK I will start a vote on this... Oliver
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:32:29 -0800, James Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can probably start putting something together this weekend. Target the > release for the end of next week, let's say. > > I'm torn between another beta and a release candidate. I'd really like > to get 2.1 out before the end of the year, so I think I'd prefer the RC, > but it really depends on the state of the open issues and I haven't been > keeping up with those as close as I could be. > > +1 for a release next week. > +.5 for RC. > > -James > > > > On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 23:12 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > Folks, > > > > after we fixed the Oracle and the Mac OS X blockers are there any > > other issues you feel that should be addressed before we can get to > > the next release? > > > > Anyway, should the next release be a beta or a release candidate? Even > > though there have been additional patches, if there are no more major > > open issues I would be +1 for a release candidate as 2.1 has been in > > the release cycle for quite a while... > > > > Oliver > > > > P.S.: James would you be available for a next release soon, anyway? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
