I've now updated the patch for defect 32250 to reflect the latest source on
the 2.1 release branch. The defects are:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32250
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32072
Warwick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warwick Burrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 6:10 PM
> To: 'Slide Developers Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: 2.1 RC1?
>
>
>
> Doh! I forgot that I hadn't to subscribed to it and yet I've
> been sending messages to it! :-) I've subscribed now and
> have sent this reply to the dev list.
>
> The second defect one is 32072. I transcribed the numbers
> wrong. Its a one word addition only as per the description.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32072
>
> And I'll generate a new patch file for the changes for defect
> 32250 against the latest source in CVS.
>
> Warwick
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:31 PM
> > To: Warwick Burrows; Slide Developers Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: 2.1 RC1?
> >
> >
> > I sent it to slide dev list... Do you realize that you are
> > not subscribed to the dev list at all? So, you have not
> > received any of the previous messages to the list???
> >
> > Ooopps..
> >
> > Anyway, I would like to commit your patches, however, the
> > patch for 32250 does not match the current state of the
> > release branch of the CVS head, so I did not make it to
> > commit it. Could you supply a new one?
> >
> > Concernig issue 32702, bugzilla does not find 32702...
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:17:58 -0800, Warwick Burrows
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > No I didn't see your post. Somehow I missed it. Which list
> > did it go
> > > to?
> > >
> > > There's two patches I wanted to submit. 32250 and 32702.
> > The latter is
> > > a one liner that looks like it was applied once then removed by
> > > accident with the next submission.
> > >
> > > I've been pinging Berin on a very regular basis about the
> committer
> > > account but he still hasn't heard from his counterpart who
> > processes
> > > the licenses. I faxed in the ILA again a second time this
> > morning just
> > > in case it disappeared at their end.
> > >
> > > I'd hate to see 2.1 RC1 go out without these fixes. Do you want to
> > > wait for my committer account to come through or just commit them?
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
