I will apply the patches and start the release the process. Holler if there are still any outstanding patches/issues.
-James On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 17:22 -0800, Warwick Burrows wrote: > I've now updated the patch for defect 32250 to reflect the latest source on > the 2.1 release branch. The defects are: > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32250 > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32072 > > Warwick > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Warwick Burrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 6:10 PM > > To: 'Slide Developers Mailing List' > > Subject: RE: 2.1 RC1? > > > > > > > > Doh! I forgot that I hadn't to subscribed to it and yet I've > > been sending messages to it! :-) I've subscribed now and > > have sent this reply to the dev list. > > > > The second defect one is 32072. I transcribed the numbers > > wrong. Its a one word addition only as per the description. > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32072 > > > > And I'll generate a new patch file for the changes for defect > > 32250 against the latest source in CVS. > > > > Warwick > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:31 PM > > > To: Warwick Burrows; Slide Developers Mailing List > > > Subject: Re: 2.1 RC1? > > > > > > > > > I sent it to slide dev list... Do you realize that you are > > > not subscribed to the dev list at all? So, you have not > > > received any of the previous messages to the list??? > > > > > > Ooopps.. > > > > > > Anyway, I would like to commit your patches, however, the > > > patch for 32250 does not match the current state of the > > > release branch of the CVS head, so I did not make it to > > > commit it. Could you supply a new one? > > > > > > Concernig issue 32702, bugzilla does not find 32702... > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:17:58 -0800, Warwick Burrows > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > No I didn't see your post. Somehow I missed it. Which list > > > did it go > > > > to? > > > > > > > > There's two patches I wanted to submit. 32250 and 32702. > > > The latter is > > > > a one liner that looks like it was applied once then removed by > > > > accident with the next submission. > > > > > > > > I've been pinging Berin on a very regular basis about the > > committer > > > > account but he still hasn't heard from his counterpart who > > > processes > > > > the licenses. I faxed in the ILA again a second time this > > > morning just > > > > in case it disappeared at their end. > > > > > > > > I'd hate to see 2.1 RC1 go out without these fixes. Do you want to > > > > wait for my committer account to come through or just commit them? > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
