Subversion is targeted as a replacement for cvs. So it's mainly focussed toward the versioning features of the webdav protocols. Unfortunately it is not really delta-v compliant. Otherwise is would be possible that some day in the future we could use all the nice subversion clients to control Slide versions. So if you put together apache httpd, subversion and mod_dav you'll get a c++-based webdav server that supports a lot of nice things but neither WebDAV based DASL (search), ACL (access control) nor notifications. So Slide is more complete concerning the WebDAV protocols but does not currently support the Delta-V spec completely. It would be nice if these two servers would get compliant some day... The big plus of the WebDAV protocols is that they don't depend on the implementing language. So if Slide and Subversion will speak the same WebDAV dialect, you can use the client of your choice, no matter in which language they are coded. Projector is currently supporting MS Exchange and Slide as WebDAV repository, but I'll try to make it work with apache httpd/Subversion to support this interesting platform as well. Cheers, Daniel
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:slide-dev-return-15193-apmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von BillyJoe McCue > Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. Dezember 2004 01:47 > An: Slide Developers Mailing List > Betreff: How does subversion relate/compare with slide? > > I have a friend of mine who has brought up the subject of Subversion > several times in the past few conversations we had about content > management and Apache Slide. He asked me if these two technologies > were attempting to achieve basically the same thing and/or if they > would be competition for each other. We compared notes from or > research to date, but lack of extensive experience with these products > has left us still wondering. My response to his statements of many > interesting Subversion features was that they sounded similliar to > some of the new Projector features and abilities with slide. > > Just wondering if anybody else had a clearer comparison. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
