Remy Maucherat wrote:
> The spec just states that principals can be resources if the
> implementation choses to.
Admittedly the language is a little vague, but my reading is that a
principle is defined as an HTTP resource, and PROPFIND/PROPPATCH are
optional.
> That's not enough for me ... Perhaps I'll use one or two proprietary
> properties to give role information, and manipultate that using
> PROPPATCH/PROPFIND.
Sounds like a better approach than defining custom methods :-)
> It's indeed not the same as a group.
Ah, OK, don't mind me :-)
--
http: www.holoweb.net/~zodiac/ | jabber: zodiac(@)jabber!org
email: zodiac(@)holoweb!net | icq: #78724820
-----------------------------------------------------------------
condom: general protection error, child process produced.
