This is interesting.. I have never understood the relationship of the Jakarta group wrt resources. If I'm hearing that someone or some group within the Jakarta group has pulled off assigned commiters to work on another project, then some underlying initiative would have to be greater than permanently assigned resources to a specific project. Is this correct? I'm mostly familiar with things like Struts, Commons, and Tomcat where you see the same names all the time. So what's different about Slide? Just trying to understand why Slide has become a wasteland from the core commiters recently in leau of "other things".
Thanks, James > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 5:39 PM > To: Slide Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: newbie question about slide future > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am working solely on the WebDav client-side, so I am happy to > > extrapolate it out of the existing Slide project as > suggested by James > > and make it shinier, etc. > > > > Has anyone actually _ever_ had any response from a developer on the > > project that they can get in touch with to let them know our plans? > > > > Many (most?) of us are still here, but busy with other things - I for > one simply don't have any time to contribute to slide at the > moment. I'm > happy to see people getting back to doing new stuff with slide, but I > was mostly waiting for some sort of consensus among new developers to > arise as to what you guys want to do. > > Mike > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
