I know that I would like to continue to use Slide with the reliable 4.1.x version but I don't use the 4.1.x binary distribution anyway. But a shift away from tomcat 4.1 x in the actual code base would be more of a concern to me. You're not suggesting this though are you?
Thanks, Warwick > -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 7:26 AM > To: Slide Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: JAASRealm classloder problem with Tomcat 5 (not 4) > > > No. The reason was Tomcat 5 was pretty new at the time of the 2.0 > release and people were asking to have the "reliable" 4 > version as well. > I can see no more reasons to stick to 4 anymore. Except: We > already had > the 2.1 with the Tomcat 4 distribution. However, if anyone has to fo > with Tomcat 4 he/she can still patch it with the ant tasks. > > Oliver > > Unico Hommes schrieb: > > > I don't use the tomcat bundles but to me it makes perfect sense to > > have > > only one out-of-the box distribution. What was the reason > for having > > both in the first place? Was it this JAASRealm issue? In > that case even > > more reason to drop tomcat 4 bundle. > > > > -- > > Unico > > > > Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > > >> Isn't it about time do drop the Tomcat 4 bundle as a distribution > >> along with that? > >> > >> Oliver > >> > >> Unico Hommes schrieb: > >> > >>> Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > >>> > >>>> I mentioned before that in Tomcat 5 there was the old silly > >>>> classloader problem with the JAASRealm we had with the ordinary > >>>> SlideRealm before. So I decided to stick to the > SlideRealm. I have, > >>>> however, found out what the problem was > >>>> > >>>> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29406 > >>>> > >>>> and it obviously has been fixed in 5.0.28. You just have > to change > >>>> the configuration in server.xml and add something like > >>>> > >>>> useContextClassLoader="false" > >>>> > >>>> to your JAAS ream defintion and things work from a single war. > >>>> > >>>> What about changing the default Tomcat bundle to this setting? > >>>> Maybe > >>>> even for the 2.1 release? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'd say go for it :-) > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Unico > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> - > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
