If it is maybe it would be easiest to simply disallow the use of MacroStores in such scenarios?!
Oliver
Stefan L�tzkendorf schrieb:
Did you mean something like this?
<scope match="/" store="s1"> <scope match="/a/deeper/path" store="s2">
copy /a to /some/collection
both /a and /some/collection are mapped to the same store s1 but some descendants of the source are from are in store s2.
Thats strange by may happen.
Stefan
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Stefan L�tzkendorf schrieb:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann schrieb:
Stefan L�tzkendorf schrieb:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
How do I find out which stores are involved? Analysing what has been configured in Domain.xml?
what about that? Uri source, destination; if (source.getStore() == destination.getStore()) { // source and destination are in the same store }
Glad I asked someone ;) My solution would have been crazy...
But wait: this will not work when successors of the Uris are in different stores :(
??? can you give me an example?
No, seems this was just nonsense ...
Oliver
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
