Hi Oliver,
I can't believe it worked just for me, I like the way the WCK
works, and I found it quite straightforward.
With the latest cvs I was also able to make the macro store
work as expected. The one thing that IMHO would make the
WCK better would be the possibility to deploy the webdav
servlet indipendent of slide, what I mean is that right now
there's no way to make the WCK communicate with something
that is not running in the same webapp, I had to use RMI to
overcome this which is a big waste of bandwidth. I do however
understand that the WCK is so deeply tight with slide that it would
be almost unfeasible.
Thanks for the code.

I took a look at the transaction package and I have to say that
I like very much, I'd love to see an extension to it based upon the
JGroups jars :-)

Alessandro.



----- Original Message ----- From: "Oliver Zeigermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Slide Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: WCK: Does it work?



Added a bunch of disclaimers to the WCK page now. Do you have the
impression the WCK is optimistic/pessimistic/rather fair according the
useability of WCK? What should be changed to give someone the right
impression?

Oliver

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:08:04 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,

has anyone except Alessandro had any success with WCK? Does it work at
all? Has it actually been useful? If not what should be changed? At
which points more documentation would be helpful?

Anyone with any experience is kindly asked to add to the WCK Wiki page at

http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-slide/WebDavConstructionKit

Thanks,

Oliver


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to