Not quite sure what you are suggesting here... If the WCK reference implementations where separated from WCK where should they go then? They need WCK to run and are a good starting point for people who does their own WCK store implementations.
Oliver On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 14:25:12 +0200, Roman D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you think about separating reference implementation from WCK? > How it will work when WCK become official package? Slide will have WCK > included, it would be difficult to run WCK reference webapp. Currently > it's a specilal Slide build that has WCK implementation instead of default. > It would be great if you could have separate source package of reference > implementation so you can deploy it with Slide, it will give easier > jump-start for users like me. > > Regards. > > > > Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > Folks, > > > > has anyone except Alessandro had any success with WCK? Does it work at > > all? Has it actually been useful? If not what should be changed? At > > which points more documentation would be helpful? > > > > Anyone with any experience is kindly asked to add to the WCK Wiki page at > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-slide/WebDavConstructionKit > > > > Thanks, > > > > Oliver > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
