Slide does not support JRS170. Jackrabbit isn't used either. It's the other way round as well, Jackrabbit does not use Slide either.
I guess there are quite a number of parameters included in the decision which way to go, so I really can not make any recommendation. Good thing about WebDAV is that there already are a number of applications supporting it. Drawback would be that WebDAV by nature is a client/sever protocol, so you would always have the communication overhead. On the other hand while JSR170 covers only certain aspects of a content store, WebDAV is pretty much complete. Additionally, programming against JSR170 would restrict you to Java solutions. I *personally* would not at all recommend programming against the sever Slide API... Oliver On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:52:17 -0500, Jeff Broberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, simple question. Is the Slide API based on JSR170 ? If so, is > JackRabbit used inside Slide ? We are considering if we should write our > java clients to use WebDAV client protocols or use the Slide API, or if > possible the 170 api. > > Any guidance would be appreciated. > > Jeff > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
