After all it is just a hack... 

Oliver


On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:08:44 +0100, Jacob Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I have been looking more into this and it seems that Oliver's conclusion was
> right. In order to get the correct history path you need to know what uri
> the request originates from, and from what I can see, this information is
> not available as the system is constructed now.
> 
> I still think that this should be fixed in later versions of slide, but for
> now I guess we have to state that these two settings are not compatible.
> 
> 
> 
> /jacob
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jacob Lund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Slide Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 3:59 PM
> Subject: Re: history-collection-hack bug
> 
> > Well from what I can see, there should be no problem with the combination!
> > The only thing is this getHistoryPathHandler function! However to resolve
> > the history path I need some information that is not available in the
> > class by default, but as I said I am not very familiar with this part of
> > the code.
> >
> > /jacob
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Oliver Zeigermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Slide Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 3:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: history-collection-hack bug
> >
> >
> >> ???
> >>
> >> Maybe the problem is that the history folder structures with the hack
> >> turned on / off are incompatible?
> >>
> >> Oliver
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:41:02 +0100, Jacob Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> OK - I think I found the origin of the problem.
> >>>
> >>> In the HistoryPathHandler class there are 2 getHistoryPathHandler
> >>> functions,
> >>> but only one of them are handling the situation where the history path
> >>> has a
> >>> parameter in it.
> >>>
> >>> I don't know this part of the code very well, so I don't have a solution
> >>> yet.
> >>>
> >>> /jacob
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Jacob Lund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> To: "Slide Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 3:42 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: history-collection-hack bug
> >>>
> >>> >I am looking into it now - i just found out!
> >>> >
> >>> > It does not throw an exception! I will report back as soon as I have
> >>> > something.
> >>> >
> >>> > /jacob
> >>> >
> >>> > ----- Original Message -----
> >>> > From: "Oliver Zeigermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> > To: "Slide Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 3:35 PM
> >>> > Subject: Re: history-collection-hack bug
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >> Any idea what the problem with the hack is?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Oliver
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:33:16 +0100, Jacob Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>> Hi all,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> When slide is configured to split the history collection into
> >>> >>> seperate
> >>> >>> stores  <parameter name="historypath">/history/${store}</parameter>,
> >>> >>> then
> >>> >>> the history-collection-hack breaks the versioning part of slide.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I have attached an example domain.xml file. When
> >>> >>> history-collection-hack
> >>> >>> is
> >>> >>> set to false it works fine.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I tested this with 2.1rc1.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> /jacob
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to