Hi,

Agreed. About the only two differences I actually see between Sling and
microsling are:

   * Full-Blown and powerfull DefaultServlet (ujax amongst other things)
   * very simple setup/startup

The first issue may probably easily be "ported" to Sling in a separate
DefaultServelt project. The basis for a flexible DefaultServlet is
provided  by ServletResolver of the sling/core project.

The second issue is actually not really a big one: The launcher folder
contains two projects app and webapp. The app project is a project setup
to launch Sling from the command line. This may easily be extended to
include all required bundles to run Sling (or a minimal subset).

The launcher/webapp project is just an extension of the launcher/app
project wrapping it in a web application archive instead of a standalone
application. I think, for a quick 15minutes test, a standalone java
application packed in a single exectuable JAR file is much easier to use
than a web application ...

So, basically, all is there in Sling to build such a thing.

... The only thing missing is WebDAV: I think, if we could integrate
this also as a Bundle, we could have a single application jar file being
able to launch Sling with a repo and WebDAV and initial content if
requireed etc.

WDYT ?

Regards
Felix

Am Montag, den 17.12.2007, 10:33 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> Hi,
> 
> I think microsling is now ready to become just a specific
> configuration of Sling.
> 
> That would save us the extra work (and potential community
> fragmentation) (and user indecision) (and fuzzy "marketing" message)
> that comes with having two similar-but-still-different codebases.
> 
> I'm pretty sure we can graft the microsling stuff on Sling as a set of
> OSGi bundles, without requiring any OSGi knowledge from beginners, and
> keep microsling's ease of use, all of microsling's current features,
> and the "testable in 15 minutes from scratch" requirement.
> 
> Empowering users to jump from simple microsling scripted stuff to
> full-blown OSGi-based java modules, within the same framework and
> webapp, sounds quite exciting to me.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> -Bertrand, operating in Monday Morning's Wild Thinking Mode ;-)

Reply via email to