Hi, On Jan 2, 2008 10:18 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My changes to the code use (some ugly) method reflection instead of > relying on a specific interface. We could either go this way (in addition > we could also check if the repository in question implements the > interface by checking for the interface *name*) or we could require > that the jackrabbit api is put into a shared class loader. For ease > of use I would go the first way.
The "correct" solution would IMHO be to have the Jackrabbit API in a shared class loader, just like the JCR API. BR, Jukka Zitting
