Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Jukka Zitting: > Hi, > > On Jan 2, 2008 10:18 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My changes to the code use (some ugly) method reflection instead of > > relying on a specific interface. We could either go this way (in addition > > we could also check if the repository in question implements the > > interface by checking for the interface *name*) or we could require > > that the jackrabbit api is put into a shared class loader. For ease > > of use I would go the first way. > > The "correct" solution would IMHO be to have the Jackrabbit API in a > shared class loader, just like the JCR API.
I completely agree. And no, there is no third solution, because the second is the right one :-) Regards Felix
