On Feb 7, 2008 8:42 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WDYT ?
It all sounds good to me, except that I'd call the property sling:resourceSupertype instead of sling:superResourceType and talk of "resource supertype" instead of "super resource type", that sounds clearer to me as supertypes and subtypes are known concepts. -Bertrand
