On Feb 7, 2008 8:42 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> WDYT ?

It all sounds good to me, except that I'd call the property

  sling:resourceSupertype

instead of

  sling:superResourceType

and talk of "resource supertype" instead of "super resource type",
that sounds clearer to me as supertypes and subtypes are known
concepts.

-Bertrand

Reply via email to