Hi David, Am Donnerstag, den 21.02.2008, 20:32 +0100 schrieb David Nuescheler: > responding to myself: > > > so: > > > > GET /test.esp -> returns the sourcecode > > GET /test.esp.run -> executes the script > > > > after talking to Bertrand and suddenly remembering the discussion I > had with Felix a while > ago ;) I think Felix came up with the even better solution to use the > proper extension that > fits the mime-type. so we would end up with something like: > > GET /test.esp.exec.html
This could work, using "exec" as the marker to execute the script using html as the extension > > or > > GET /test.esp.html This is currently implemented but is problematic because a request such as test.esp.1.json would not return the test.esp node as JSON but execute the test.esp script. Looking at all of this, I currently tend to think, we should just switch off this direct script execution and think about how to implement it, should the need arise.... Regards Felix > > to trigger an execution of script. > > As far as I understand people are generally in agreement with that so > feel free to ignore my previous mail ;) > > regards, > david
