Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Can we find something
else than "nodeName" ? How about "exactName" ?...
nodeName is IMHO better, as the parameter describes the name of the
created node...exactName could be the exact name of your sister ;-)
:)
But to be consistent, nameHint should be nodeNameHint maybe. A bit
longish but very clear.
Ok, we should either use "nodeNameHint" and "nodeName"
or
"name" and "nameHint"
From those two options I would prefer the first one.
Carsten
... And then, I would not filter or otherwise mangle the exact name (this is
the difference to Betrand's proposal) and rather fail if the name is
invalid....
We are in agreement, that's what I suggested, no filtering for nodeName.
-Bertrand
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
