Hi, On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -1 until we clarify whether we can actually use the JSON code, see [1] > and [2]. I just realized the potential issue when reviewing the > licenses. As mentioned in [2] there seems to be an alternatively > licensed version of the code that we might need to switch to. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/gglluph3ifuyqiwq > [2] http://markmail.org/message/nzyximv23dvncnai
As discussed in [1], the consensus on legal-discuss seems to be that the license is OK for us, so I'm lifting this -1. However, we should do something about the top level NOTICE and LICENSE files, so I'm still -1 on the release as-is. Also, it worries me that things like the W3C copyright and license information from the jackrabbit-core dependency are nowhere mentioned. Is it expected that users should go through two levels of jar packaging to find all the relevant license and copyright information? Other than that I think the release looks good. I checked the following artifacts: 75eb13ce016cc059888de8838e7a501e sling-2.0.0-incubator-release.tar.gz 2a92c3bb2d054e838acdc023c8bf843a org.apache.sling.launchpad.app-2.0.2-incubator-bin.tar.gz 83b4e9de62baf44612a9208595322f3b org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp-2.0.2-incubator.tar.gz BR, Jukka Zitting
