On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Vidar Ramdal <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...after looking at EspReader, it does not look easy to extend it. > .espx sounds good to me.... I was going to say "do we really need a new extension", but thinking about it having a different extension with a different parser sounds easier to manage. > But should the .espx in fact be an XML parser (thus, fail if the input > document is not valid XML)? I'd much prefer a permissive parser that only uses XMLish tags to delimit code sections - assuming that meets your requirement of editor friendliness. -Bertrand
