On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > ...If down-stream users want to not pay the price for well-formedness, they > should use the traditional approach using <%= %>. Event there, > developers are required to apply some form of well-formedness....
Ok, as long as we don't deprecate the loose <%= %> syntax I see your point. > ...So, I would be all for using an XML parser for espx scripts. This > requires more from the programmer but gives back much more.... Not convinced, but if there's choice, people can pick their poison ;-) -Bertrand
