On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 10:38:39AM +1000, CaT wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 10:31:04AM +1000, Angus Lees wrote: > > bah. on my laptop (which doesn't have X), i just run emacs. then i can > > split the screen, switch buffers, run shells, run remote shells, etc, > > etc. cutting and pasting between buffers (no matter how large the > > selection is) is trivial. > > Yeah. But screen isn't 20gig in size. ;) Neither is emacs, now that most of the functionality has been farmed off into loadable modules. Looks more like a LISP machine OS every day. -- Andrew -- SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the text
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: Th... Nick Croft
- RE: [SLUG] Religious Wars: Th... David Zverina
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: Th... Herbert Xu
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: Th... Jobst Schmalenbach
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: Th... Alexander Else
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: Th... Jobst Schmalenbach
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: Th... DaZZa
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: Th... Jobst Schmalenbach
- [SLUG] Re: Religious Wars: Th... Angus Lees
- Re: [SLUG] Re: Religious Wars... CaT
- Re: [SLUG] Re: Religious Wars... Andrew Reilly
- Re: [SLUG] Re: Religious Wars... Michael Lake
- Re: [SLUG] Re: Religious Wars... Herbert Xu
- Re: [SLUG] Re: Religious Wars... Triet H. Lai
- Re: [SLUG] Re: Religious Wars... Herbert Xu
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: The Next Battle? Jobst Schmalenbach
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: The Next Battle? Dean Hamstead
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: The Next Battle? Conrad Parker
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: The Next Battle? Graeme Merrall
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: The Next Battle? Matthew Dalton
- Re: [SLUG] Religious Wars: The Next Battle? Jeff Waugh
