> Michael Lake wrote:
> 
> The fvwm2 should be *much* faster than E or Sawmill. I have
> a 33MHz, 32MB RAM 486 at home which runs fvwm or fvwm2 at
> quite OK speed. That sort of machine would not be useful
> running E.


By Jove! fvwm? That's such a resource hog! ;)

Try this: http://users.ch.genedata.com/~enh/lwm/

Or specifically: http://users.ch.genedata.com/~enh/lwm/lwm-1.01.tar.gz

(which is an updated version - much better than the 1.0 one)


lwm is brilliant for old machines...

- Jeff


-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------- http://www.slug.org.au/ --

              linux.conf.au - coming to Sydney in January 2001

      Installing Linux Around Australia - http://linux.org.au/installfest/



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to