> Michael Lake wrote: > > The fvwm2 should be *much* faster than E or Sawmill. I have > a 33MHz, 32MB RAM 486 at home which runs fvwm or fvwm2 at > quite OK speed. That sort of machine would not be useful > running E. By Jove! fvwm? That's such a resource hog! ;) Try this: http://users.ch.genedata.com/~enh/lwm/ Or specifically: http://users.ch.genedata.com/~enh/lwm/lwm-1.01.tar.gz (which is an updated version - much better than the 1.0 one) lwm is brilliant for old machines... - Jeff -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------- http://www.slug.org.au/ -- linux.conf.au - coming to Sydney in January 2001 Installing Linux Around Australia - http://linux.org.au/installfest/ -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
