This is actually the first point of the license for dnscache: (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/dist.html) -- You are permitted to distribute a precompiled djbdns package if - installing the package produces exactly the same files, in exactly the same locations, that a user would obtain by downloading, compiling, and installing dnscache-1.00.tar.gz -- It's a bit like the Pine license, really. Clearly in violation of the DFSG. Matthew Angus Lees wrote: > > so does that mean that when a distro (for example: debian) decides > they want to patch the source to change a default path, or something - > they can't distribute the resultant binaries? (without renaming it to > "dnscache-debian" or some other shenanigans) -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
