On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Tom Massey wrote:
> Just like to make a recommendation that anybody who's interested in a
> light weight text browser might like to check out Links (no that's not a
> typo for Lynx). Links is similar to Lynx in a number of ways, but seems
> to have a number of features Lynx lacks - good table support for one
> thing - renders some pages *much* nicer than Lynx (eg, try running them
> both against Slashdot).
And let us not forget w3m, which does rendering too and has SSL support.
w3m vs Links seems to be a bit of a trade-off. SSL for background
loading. But I haven't tried Links first-hand yet, so there may be other
advantages/disadvantages. Seems w3m is more actively developed, but that
doesn't mean a better client I guess.
http://ei5nazha.yz.yamagata-u.ac.jp/~aito/w3m/eng/
Andrew.
--
If you are still using my old e-mail addresses, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or [EMAIL PROTECTED], you should change to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
