Exchange support under Linux = IMAP/LDAP. Sure all the features don't
work but that's Exchanges limitation not Linux's.

George Vieira wrote:
> 
> I'm the same.. I started with W98 here at work and then went to W2K and was
> fine for a while and then the usual happened.... M$ products didn't work
> with M$ products.
> 
> So I tossed the whole thing and went to NT 4 WKS as I run it at home and
> it's quite sweet. It's only because I need Outlook for Exchange server as I
> haven't seen any Exchange Server support under Linux otherwise I would have
> fully moved over.
> 
> Oh, of course I have a 10GB linux partition when I have one of those days.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Wiltshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 4:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SLUG] hrmm.. go Telstra
> 
> From: Jobst Schmalenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
> >Points (proven):
> >
> > * I have yet to hear ONE SysAdmin who *LIKES* NT
> 
> I'm an SysAdmin and I like NT.  I also like and use Linux.
> 
> Some of my frien^H^H^H^H^H associates think I'm strange...
> 
> ;-)
> 
> John Wiltshire
> 
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
> 
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to